Virtual Screening and ADMET Studies to Identify KSP Inhibitors as Anticancer Therapeutics

Raadhika Chelamalla, Ajitha Makula



Virtual Screening plays an important role to achieve binding affinity, receptor and library pre-processing, docking, scoring and top scoring hits. Optimization of drug ADME parameters continues to play an important role to ensure that the exposure is sufficient to achieve proof of concept, and ultimately efficacy, safely in clinical trials to address unmet medical need. In order to identify potential inhibitors we employed various computational approaches. In this work, we computationally screened and analyzed 60 analogs and further tested their ADME/T profiles. Library of the molecules was constructed based upon structural modifications of pyrimidines and indole nucleus. Structural modifications were performed for the series of 4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-6-methyl-2-oxo-N-substituted[(Z)-(2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)amino]-3,4-dihydro-1H-pyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivatives in an order to get better  binding energies as compared with Ispinseb. The molecules with better (lower) binding energies were subjected to predict ADMET properties. Ten molecules from the series IP1-IP60 were found acceptable with binding energies and pharmacokinetic properties. On the basis of the binding energies and ADMET properties we have identified compound IP2 and IP4 to be the best interacting molecules. The molecules with acceptable ADMET properties and better binding energies were prioritized for synthesis and anticancer evaluation. 


KSP inhibitors, Virtual screening, ADMET and Indolo Pyrimidines

Full Text:



Sharp DJ, Rogers GC, Scholey JM. Microtubule motors in mitosis. Nature. 2000; 407: 41–47. 2. Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM. Kinesin motors and disease. Trends. Cell. Biol. 2002; 12: 585–591. 3. Endow SA, Baker DS. Processive and nonprocessive models of kinesin movement. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2003; 65: 161–175. 4. Mayer TU, Kapoor TM, Haggarty SJ. Small molecule inhibitor of spindle bipolarity identified in a phenotype based screen. Science. 1999; 286: 971–974. 5. Kapoor TM, Mayer TU, Coughlin ML. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell. Biol. 2000; 150: 975–988. 6. Sakowicz R, Finer JT, Beraud C. Antitumor activity of a kinesin inhibitor. Cancer. Res. 2004; 64 (9): 3276–3280. 7. Turner J, Anderson R, Guo J. Crystal structure of the mitotic spindle kinesin Eg5 reveals a novel conformation of the neck-linker. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 25496–25502. 8. Yan YW, Sardana V, Xu B. Inhibition of a mitotic motor protein: where, how, and conformational consequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2004; 335: 547–554. 9. Burris H, LoRussoZ P, Jones S. A phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous administration of SB715992 on a once weekly for three consecutive weeks schedule in patients with refractory solid tumors. ECCO. 2003; S172-S173. 10. Bergnes G, Ha E, Feng B. Am. Mitotic kinesin-targeted antitumor agents: discovery, lead optimization and anti-tumor activity of a series of novel quinazolinones as inhibitors of kinesin spindle protein (KSP). 93rd AACR Annual Meeting, San Francisco USA April, 2002; 43: Abstract 3648. 11. Discovery studio Visualizer 4.2. Accelrys Software Inc., 2011., 12. Goodsell DS, Morris GM, Olson AJ. Automated docking of flexible ligands: applications of AutoDock. J. Mol. Recognit. 1996; 9; 1. 13. Morris GM. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comp. Chem. 1998; 19: 1639. 14. Sander T, Freyss J, Von Korff M. DataWarrior: an open-source program for chemistry aware data visualization and analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015; 55: 460-73. 15. Lipinski CA. Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today Technol Drug. Discov. Today. Technol. 2004; 1: 337-41. 16. Congreve M, Carr R, Murray C. A. 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery. Drug. Discov. Today. 2003; 8: 876-7.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Radhika Chelamalla, Ajitha Makula


Advanced Research Journals

4/70-71. Black Well HB, AL 30100 2009-2017


Follow @arjournals on Twitter